GVRA Executive Summary

A person sitting on a chair
Description generated with very high confidence
FINAL REPORT

JULY 8, 2019

OPERATIONAL
REVIEW

PROJECT

GEORGIA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY

A close up of a logo
Description generated with very high confidence

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

2

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

2

APPENDIX

OUTLINE

ROADMAP & NEXT STEPS

ASSESSMENTS | OBSERVATIONS | RECOMMENDATIONS

GIB

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

3

EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY

cid:image007.png@01D4ADC4.41800050
GVRA

GEORGIA VOCATIONAL
REHABILITATION AGENCY

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

4


Process evaluation of key administrative functions,
looking for inefficient and ineffective processes


Identification of duplicate or unnecessary roles
within the administrative organizational structure


Full evaluation of key processes and organizational
structure at GIB


Recommendations for new processes and
organizational structure of all administrative
functions


Recommendations for new processes,
organizational structure, and increased profitability
at GIB

Assessment of Vocational Rehabilitation, BEP, DAS, and other services
and programs was
not
in the scope of this assessment.

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Current State

Project Objectives

Accenture conducted the GVRA assessment over a period of seven weeks from

May 20

July 8, 2019


General Assembly substantively reduced FY20
administrative budget, exacerbated by a loss of
federal matching dollars


To address serious structural, training, workload,
and pay issues within Vocational Rehabilitation and
other services, GVRA must first address
administrative processes upon which those
solutions will rely

GIB is likely unsustainable with its current market
focus


Newly appointed GVRA Executive Director brings a
mandate to restore the Agency’s focus on the field

Why Now?

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

5

APPROACH

Accenture conducted interviews, workshops, and operational reviews to identify a
set of recommendations for GVRA to consider. These recommendations have been
further organized into a Roadmap for implementation.

Listen, Learn,

Discover

Evaluate and Envision

Recommend

Road Maps

Gain an in

depth picture of
the Agency’s operations, its
current pain points, and its
potential opportunities for
improvement.

Develop prioritized list of
improvement opportunities

Address specific concerns.

Define and validate
proposed administrative
organization and high level
future state process design.

Design road map

for implementation.


Separate interviews = 82

Design thinking workshop = 5
with 100 attendees

Operational and functional
process map flows = 28

GVRA locations = 6

GIB locations = 3

Document reviews = 300+


Total issues identified = 54

Weighed each against an
algorithm of weighted efforts
and benefits, including the
improvement of processes,
internal customer service,
Agency oversight and
controls; staffing
requirements; and cost
savings.


11 Quick Wins for GVRA

15 Opportunities for GVRA

15 Quick Wins for GIB

13 Opportunities for GIB


Provide GVRA with a
suggested timeline for
implementation of the
projects

Suggest PMO for
implementation phase

Group brainstorm
Head with gears
Checklist
Playbook

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

6

WHERE WE’VE BEEN

A group of people sitting at a table
Description generated with very high confidence
RWS

A group of people sitting at a table in a room
Description generated with very high confidence
Columbus

A picture containing building, tree, outdoor
Description generated with high confidence
Athens

GIB

Columbus

College
Park

Athens

Tifton

Warm

Springs

Warner Robins

Griffin

Bainbridge

GVRA Visit

GIB Visit

Tifton

Visits included input from Americus, Augusta, Canton, and Norcross.

Atlanta

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

7

GVRA: WHAT WE LEARNED

Culture

While GVRA team members understand the Agency’s mission, the day

to

day culture
exhibits widespread territorialism, fear, frustration, and mistrust, creating an environment
that is not focused on serving internal and external customers.

Two GVRAs

The chasm between the State Office administrative team and those in the field is stark.
With near uniformity, field staff report that the State Office neither understands their work
nor supports them in even routine matters.

Process Issues

Core HR and fiscal processes are inefficient and lack formality; others are duplicative and
misaligned within the Agency. Staff face significant delays in everything from hiring to
contract review. Budget controls, when existent, are lax and ineffective.

Agency Direction

Even though team members understand the mission, no unifying strategic goals or
direction exist. Inclusive, agency

wide strategic planning, KPIs, and performance
management are largely absent or, where present, often ignored.

Organizational Structure

Most recognize that substantive portions of the current administrative structure inhibit
success. The leadership

to

staff ratio is top heavy. Business functions are not aligned to
maximize efficiency.

Decision Making

Separate from process and structural issues, GVRA personnel lack clarity on who makes
decisions. Some decisions require too many approvals; others are left in limbo because no
one knows who holds authority. Many feel unempowered to make the simplest of decisions.

Gleaned through interviews, field visits, observations, and document reviews

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

8

GVRA SUMMARY (NON

EXHAUSTIVE)

Culture


150+ KPI measurements, largely developed without field input, lead to confusion, frustration, and apathy

Tension among directors directly impacts internal customer service

Governance & Structure


Extremely top

heavy organizational chart, with a 1:3 manager

to

team member ratio

Response times from administration to the field’s calls and emails routinely reported in as a matter of “weeks and months,” n
ot
in
hours or days

Directors fail to generate basic monthly reports on budget, contracting, personnel actions, litigation, help desk actions, et
c.,
that
would allow leadership to make more informed decisions

Human Resources


No one knows how many people work at GVRA; Human Resources, Finance, and department heads report different headcounts,
salaries, and position numbers, created conflicting, unreconciled employee census

6+ month process to recruit and hire new positions, including 3

4 month lag time on simple background checks

Hiring process requires 8

10 separate approvals, often resulting in 2

3 cycles with the same people

HR self

reported a one

year backlog on uploading already created training modules for employees to access and use

Finance & Budget


Lack of contract management system leads to delayed payments, payments for services not rendered, contracts not executed,
contracts not reviewed, and general vendor relations issues, some dating back as far as four years

No indirect cost allocation proposal since 2015

Constant reliance on “carryover” funds to balance the budget each year

Observations that point to just some of the issues facing GVRA

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

9

SUMMARY: KEY GVRA RECOMMENDATIONS

Develop GVRA Core Values as cornerstone of full
cultural change program

Promotes true team ownership of the beliefs,
principles, and aspirations that will guide all future
decisions

Redesign GVRA administration structure with specific
emphases on human resources, fiscal operations,
planning and budget, external affairs, and technology

Creates a nimble, customer

focused team with clear
functions and lanes of authority,
saving the Agency an
estimated $1,295,178

Streamline and modernize HR recruit

to

hire process
by leveraging State’s investment in HR technology
solutions

Reduces the 6+ month time now required to hire;
allows hire

to units to be more involved in selection
process, including interviews and reference checks

Consolidate dual procurement and contract offices;
institute a contract tracking system to ensure fiscal
controls throughout the process

Eliminates duplicative function and ensures that one
entity maintains fiscal controls over critical function

Link strategic planning with the budget both in
structure and in practice

Aligns GVRA goals with Agency’s priorities, policies,
budgets, KPIs, and other performance metrics

Essential Projects for Improvement

By doing this, GVRA…

We recommend a total of 15 GVRA

specific improvement projects and an
additional 11 “quick wins,” all of which are detailed throughout this assessment.

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

10

KEY GVRA RECOMMENDATIONS

Implementing these essential recommendations addresses critical issues

Recommendations

Culture

Two
GVRAs

Process
Issues

Agency
Direction

Org
Structure

Decision
Making

Develop GVRA Core Values as cornerstone of full
cultural change program

.

.

.

.

Redesign GVRA administration structure

.

.

.

.

.

.

Streamline and modernize HR recruit

to

hire process

.

.

.

Consolidate dual procurement and contract offices;
institute a contract tracking system to ensure fiscal
controls throughout the process

.

.

.

Link strategic planning with the budget both in structure
and in practice, allowing GVRA to marry its goals with
its outlays

.

.

.

.

.

.

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

11

SUMMARY: ESTIMATED TIME TO IMPLEMENT

Develop GVRA Core Values as cornerstone of full
cultural change program

Quick Win (1

3 months)

Redesign GVRA administration structure with specific
emphases on human resources, fiscal operations,
planning and budget, external affairs, and technology

6

9 months

Streamline and modernize HR recruit

to

hire process
by leveraging State’s investment in HR technology
solutions

9

12 months

Consolidate dual procurement and contract offices;
institute a contract tracking system to ensure fiscal
controls throughout the process

6

9 months

Link strategic planning with the budget both in
structure and in practice

3

6 months

Essential Projects for Improvement

Estimated Times for Implementation

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

12

GIB: WHAT WE LEARNED

Fragmented Leadership

Split leadership structure inhibits effective decision

making. Two peer GIB Director
positions causes confusion among staff and complicates decision making and
accountability for achievement of outcomes.

Unhealthy Culture

Many GIB staff do not feel heard or respected by GIB leadership. Staff suggestions for
improvement are often discounted or dismissed out of hand by GIB leadership.
Leadership opportunities for blind employees appear limited. Staff are not informed by
management when they are eligible for retirement.

Diminishing Profitability

Current product mix has seen diminishing sales volumes. GIB operating reserve has
eroded from $1.99M in FY 15 to less than $1K in FY 19.

Lack of Transition to
Digital Economy

Product mix not focused on potential areas of growth. No clear growth plan for new
Services offerings which holds more promise for higher margins and growth.

Ineffective Marketing and
Product Development

Recent marketing efforts have limited reach. Success of box management operation at
Robins not being marketed to other organizations.

Gleaned through interviews, field visits, observations, and document reviews

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

13

GIB SUMMARY (NON

EXHAUSTIVE)

Fragmented Leadership


Tension between two current GIB Directors limits growth of Services offerings which holds more strategic growth potential
than legacy products.

Lack of cohesive strategy for operations at Griffin and Robins locations

Unhealthy Culture


In September 2018, GVRA received 255 separate complaints from 73 GIB employees out of 93 employees completing a
Customer Satisfaction Survey

Over 20 GIB workers have not been told they are eligible for retirement

Allegations of favoritism in HR decisions, a clear us/them delineation between management and labor

Diminishing Profitability


Operating reserve has fallen from $1.99M in FY 2015 to less than $1K in FY 2019

GIB employs a simplistic pricing strategy that applies standard profit margins across all products regardless of demand

GIB stopped the packaging of utensils for Military Meals Read to Eat (MREs) despite low overhead costs

Lack of Transition to Digital Economy


Not using popular sales/distribution channels (e.g., Amazon, eBay, Etsy) to sell products; lengthy order fulfillment

GIB heavily reliant on paper products which have seen decreased sales over time as federal government continues move
towards paperless processes

Ineffective Marketing and Product Development


Business Development Manager generated minimal sales during tenure with GIB; focus of GIB marketing efforts is centered
on 75 mile radius around existing GIB facilities; no formalized product development lifecycle with GVRA oversight

10% of customers (all associated with GSA purchases) account for over 80% of revenues

Observations that point to just some of the issues facing GIB

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

14

SUMMARY: KEY GIB RECOMMENDATIONS

Streamline and realign GIB organization structure to
consolidate the organization under a single GIB
Director

Reduces the number of managerial layers between the
GIB Director and front line GIB staff. Provides clarity
about decision making and accountability.

Establish new leadership and culture at GIB; new
leadership should bring a “business operator” skill set
and champion new culture with all GIB staff

Improves quality of decision making regarding pricing,
staffing, and investments. GIB staff feel like valued
members of a cohesive team working.

Establish new focus on marketing and seek to
develop new, profitable product and service offerings

Raises visibility of the GIB brand and drives new,
profitable lines of business that can be used to grow
opportunities for visually impaired Georgians.

Streamline GVRA involvement in GIB HR process;
explore leveraging the capabilities of State
investments in HR technology solutions

Reduces the length of time required for GIB to fill
vacant positions. Allows GIB to be more nimble to
respond to changes in the digital marketplace.

Formalize GVRA oversight of GIB operations and
focus on key risk areas such as budget and new
product development

Ensures that GVRA leadership is aware of GIB
performance and risks and can assist with strategic
decision

making.

Essential Projects for Improvement

By doing this, GIB…

We recommend a total of 13 GIB

specific improvement projects and an additional
15 “quick wins,” all of which are detailed throughout this assessment.

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

15

KEY GIB RECOMMENDATIONS

GIB can improve its overall performance and reverse declining sales through targeted
interventions

Recommendations

Fragmented
Leadership

Unhealthy
Culture

Diminishing
Profitability

Lack of
Transition to
Digital
Economy

Ineffective
Marketing and
Product
Development

Streamline and realign GIB organization structure to
consolidate the organization under a single GIB Director

.

.

.

Establish new leadership and culture at GIB; new
leadership should bring a “business operator” skill set and
champion new culture with all GIB staff

.

.

.

.

.

Establish new focus on marketing and seek new, profitable
product and service offerings

.

.

.

Streamline GVRA involvement in GIB HR process; explore
leveraging the capabilities of State investments in HR
technology solutions

.

.

Formalize GVRA oversight of GIB operations and focus on
key areas such as budget and new product development

.

.

.

.

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

16

SUMMARY: ESTIMATED TIME TO IMPLEMENT

Streamline and realign GIB organization structure to
consolidate the organization under a single GIB
Director

9 months

Establish new leadership and culture at GIB; new
leadership should bring a “business operator” skill set
and champion new culture with all GIB staff

6 months

Establish new focus on marketing and seek to
develop new, profitable product and service offerings

6 months

Streamline GVRA involvement in GIB HR process;
explore leveraging the capabilities of State
investments in HR technology solutions

6 months

Formalize GVRA oversight of GIB operations and
focus on key risk areas such as budget and new
product development

6 months

Essential Projects for Improvement

Estimated Times for Implementation

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

17

ORGANIZATION
& WORKFORCE

cid:image007.png@01D4ADC4.41800050
GVRA

GEORGIA VOCATIONAL
REHABILITATION AGENCY

GVRA

Hexagon
Hexagon
Hexagon
Hexagon
Hexagon

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

18

ORGANIZATION CHART

CURRENT STATE

Managerial Bloat


Ineffective performance management and inaction on
moving bottom

performing managers ‘out’ of the
organization.

Tenure based promotion and/or the use of title
promotions to drive compensation increases.

An excessive number of management layers.

GVRA Organizational Stats


Average Span = 1:3

Layers = 6

GVRA’s organization has too many layers and manager

level personnel compared to
industry benchmarks

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

19

Ideal Headcount Distribution of Role Levels Based on an Overall Average Span of Control of 4

Assuming an overall average span of control of 4
yields an ideal proportion of roles within an
organization.

The ideal organizational pyramid implies that level
of roles represents layers (i.e. All Senior
Leadership report to Executive Director, all
Directors report to Senior Leadership, etc.)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Individual Contributor

Managers/Supervisors

Directors

Senior Leadership

Executive Director

Current Org

Recommended Org

THE ‘IDEAL’ ORGANIZATION PYRAMID

Ideally, GVRA’s organization should align to leading practices on the number of layers in
the Agency and the span of control of managers/supervisors at each level

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

20

GVRA ORGANIZATION

CURRENT/FUTURE STATE

Area

Current
Staff

Current
Vacancies

Total
As Is

Total

To Be

Transfers

In

Transfers
Out

Eliminated
Vacancies

Hard
Delete

Executive Office

6

0

6

8

4

2

0

0

Human Resources

20

4

24

14

1

9

1

1

Finance

24

8

32

0

0

26

4

2

Fiscal Operations

0

0

0

20

19

0

0

0

Planning & Budget

0

0

0

8

8

0

0

Facilities

9

1

10

6

0

2

1

1

Coms & Marketing

4

1

5

0

0

4

1

0

External Affairs

6

6

0

0

0

Information Technology

16

1

17

20

4

0

1

0

Business Applications

8

2

10

0

0

6

2

2

General Counsel

4

0

4

3

0

0

0

1

Strategy & Innovation

6

0

6

0

0

1

0

5

VR Leadership

Total

97

17

114

85

42

50

10

12

Vacancies do not include staff out on FMLA. Analysis based on current organization chart. Proposed organization results in a
red
uction of 22
total positions (10 vacant and 12 filled) for a forecasted annual cost savings of approximately $1,295,178.

3 Admin
Assistants
(1 Facilities,
2HR)

Bus Apps
Sup and
Analysts

Bus Apps Not
Included in
Cost
Reduction

Finance is
divided
between
Fiscal Ops
and
Planning
and
Budget

Estimated based on HR,
Budget, and Department
documents

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

21

KEY RECOMMENDATION: NEW ORG CHART


Organizes admin around six (6) functional areas

human resources,
fiscal operations, external affairs, planning and budget, property and
facilities, and information technology

with each led by a single
director

Simplifies the core leadership structure, with an executive director, a
deputy over administrative operations, a deputy over services and
programs, and a general counsel

Creates an internal Office of Planning and Budget, which will
purposefully links agency

wide strategic planning and performance
metrics with the budget process

Reshapes Finance into Fiscal Operations with a clear focus on day

to

day transactions and accounts

Places heavy emphasis on training

Consolidates Business Applications into IT; melds together two
contracting units; unites all outward

facing team members

Through mission and FTE realignment and consolidation, reduces
the total administrative staff by 22 positions (10 vacancies and 12
presently filled), saving an estimated $
1,295,178

Reset administrative functions to serve the field more nimbly and more efficiently

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

22

GVRA RECOMMENDED ORGANIZATION CHART

Accenture has developed a future state organizational structure that GVRA could
adopt to address several of the challenges identified during this study

GVRA Organization Stats


Average Span = 1:4

Improved Manager: Individual Contributor ratio


Forecast annual cost savings of approximately $1,295,178

Layers = 5

Eliminated “Chief” layer

Consolidated multiple manager and supervisor positions performing similar functions

*GVRA presently has three competing and conflicting
sets of data relative to its administrative employees:
one from Human Resources, a second from Finance
and Budget, and a third from each unit. We have
reconciled these difference to the best of our ability.
The budget numbers represent our best estimate.

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

23

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE: LEADERSHIP TEAM

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

24

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE:
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS

CHANGES RECOMMENDED


Eliminate “Chief” layer of management

Move Business Applications under IT

Separate Fiscal Services into Fiscal
Operations and Planning and Budget

Merge Communications and Marketing
with external liaisons into External
Affairs

Link strategic planning process with
budgeting

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

25

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE:
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR SERVICES

CHANGES RECOMMENDED


Have a single lead over all services
and programs, reporting directly to
the Executive Director

Maintain VR as a discrete and
unique service

Give GIB, BEP, and DAS the same
status within the structure

Create a Performance and
Professional Development unit
responsible for professional
training and individual performance
plans and goals for VR team
members

*A full assessment of the organizational structures
of VR, BEP, and DAS falls outside the scope of
this present project. However, to be consistent
and mission

oriented, as well as reduce the
number of direct reports to the Executive Director,
we recommend that the “Services” side of GVRA
eventually be led by a Deputy Executive Director
and that all services and programs be housed
underneath.

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

26

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE: GENERAL COUNSEL

Function:

Legal

Led by:

General Counsel

Reports to:

Executive Director

# of FTEs:

3

Est. Staff Budget:

$ 361,939

CHANGES RECOMMENDED


Reduce staff by one

Require that one of the attorneys be
exclusively dedicated to VR issues and
required in his/her job description to
have particular legal knowledge in VR

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

27

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE: PROPERTY &
FACILITIES

Function:

Property, fleet, and asset
management

Led by:

Director of Property &
Facilities

Reports to:

Deputy Executive
Director for Operations

# of FTEs:

6

Est. Staff Budget:

$ 576,201

CHANGES RECOMMENDED


Shift one project manager to RWS (VR)

Consolidate multiple coordinators and
managers into a smoother operating
structure

Move Administrative Assistant to the
AA pool

Reduce total staff by four

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

28

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE: EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

Function:

Manage external
relationships and
communications

Led by:

Director of External
Affairs

Reports to:

Deputy Executive
Director for Operations

# of FTEs:

6

Est. Staff Budget:

$ 531,633

CHANGES RECOMMENDED


Consolidate all external/outward

facing
functions within the administration

Remove position of Program Marketing
Coordinator

Require that the Marketing Manager or
Communication Manager has a
background in effective social media

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

29

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE: INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY

Function:

Network and Asset
support

Led by:

Director of IT

Reports to:

Deputy Executive
Director for Operations

# of FTEs:

20

Est. Staff Budget:

$ 1,613,081

CHANGES RECOMMENDED


Consolidate Help Desks

Merge all software applications
support and network/asset support
under one department

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

30

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE: HUMAN RESOURCES

Function:

Recruiting, onboarding,
employee relations,
enterprise training

Led by:

Director of HR

Reports to:

Deputy Executive
Director for Operations

# of FTEs:

14

Est. Staff Budget:

$ 1,076,012

CHANGES RECOMMENDED


Consolidate HR managers into two

Divide HR into Talent & Classification
(recruiting to onboarding) and
Operations & Employee Relations
(post

onboarding

day

to

day)

Move 2 Admin Assistants to AA pool
for assignment

Transfer Training Manager and 3
Training Specialists to VR
(professional development training
only)

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

31

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE: FISCAL OPERATIONS

Function:

Day

to

Day transactional
financial matters

Led by:

Director of Fiscal Ops

Reports to:

Deputy Executive
Director for Operations

# of FTEs:

20

Est. Staff Budget:

$ 1,623,494

*This organizational structure is predicated on a single contracting and
procurement unit for the entire Agency. Our recommendation is to
dissolve the duplicate unit currently resident in Vocational
Rehabilitation and subsume that work in Fiscal Operations. We do not
anticipate the need for additional personnel provided that the Agency
uses a contract management and tracking system.

CHANGES RECOMMENDED


Focus unit solely on day

to

day
transactional matters such as
accounting and procurement

Eliminate four current vacancies

Enhance the Accounting Manager
position by placing revenue, general
ledger, disbursement, payroll and
accounts payable under his/her
leadership

Copyright © 2019 Accenture All rights reserved.

32

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE: PLANNING &
BUDGET

Function:

Strategic and budget
planning, preparation,
and management

Led by:

Director of Planning &
Budget

Reports to:

Deputy Executive
Director for Operations

# of FTEs:

8

Est. Staff Budget:

$ 779,598

CHANGES RECOMMENDED


Focus unit solely on budget
preparation, prioritization, and
management

Connect strategic planning to the
budget and anticipates the
development of KPIs and other metrics
from this unit

Create new positions of Budget &
Performance Manager and Strategic
Planning Project Manager